The goal of this portal is to:
Note: Ideas submitted to this portal are for collaboration and brainstorm for future releases. This portal is monitored but it not to be utilized as a support ticket system. We will facilitate a professional code of conduct to create meaningful discussion around product development. If you require customer support please email support@roomkeypms.com or visit http://roomkeypms.com/support/.
In the web based app for housekeeping, I would like to change the status (example, from Dirty to Clean) to a room which I have not assigned to an attendant.
Another example of where this is useful: We have one person who starts stripping the rooms right away. It would be good to assign this position rooms for their shift even though those rooms will need to be assigned to the attendant who will be completing the clean.
How would you rate the importance of this idea? | This is a nice to have |
Thank you for clarifying step 1, so in this instance is the following scenario correct?
Similar scenario =
Thanks so much for the clarification here.
Andy
Thanks Andy,
My thought on this was very disjointed, I see. I was writing this out during our peak season and apparently tired when doing so. I am not certain why I have these two ideas connected.
1. A room will be cleaned in the system but then maintenance will go in and fix a toilet and we need to move the room back into dirty so that it gets touch-ups on next shift. This would be an example of a room that has not been assigned to a cleaner yet later we find out it needs to have its status changed. 90% of maintenance issues are reported by our housekeeping department and so they inform maintenance directly. This would probably be our most common example.
Another example, which is happening frequently for our hotel are upgrades. We have two floors that are totally clean and ready to go; however, we are changing out something in the rooms (right now we are doing bed shirts, throws, pillows and top sheets). Housekeeping will be working their way through the rooms to replace items and so the room needs to go back into dirty status to be reinspected or to be moved from clean to 'in maintenance' although dirty is preferred so that the room is not removed from our inventory with OTA and any other direct book methods.
2. You are correct in the process.
Hey Sherrilee,
Sorry for the delay to this (and others ideas of yours). This is a request we've heard from others: to be able to update the state of a room without having to assign it out. For my own knowledge, I'm trying to understand what problem this would help you solve?
In relation to the 2nd part of your feedback, am I correct in understanding that your process is that, for example, Room 101 is assigned to a person (what is that role in your team) who's job is to strip that room, then it was be assigned to the attendant who's job it is to clean it, then it would fall to the inspector to assess it. Is that correct?
Thanks so much for the input.
Andy